Retyping the Speckled Band, Part 2: Information Dumps

Originally posted January 16, 2008.

Last time, we looked at Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s techniques of:

  • opening the story;
  • non-direct dialog;
  • laser-focused description;
  • establishment of character.

Today we’re going to look at how Doyle attacks one of the most difficult methods for any fiction writer: the information dump.

Let us type.

Continue reading

Retyping the Speckled Band, Part 1: Beginning with Style

Originally posted January 14, 2008. My thoughts these days are that writing is not a physical skill, but through this exercise (and the painting one, for that matter) you naturally study in more depth what’s going on. The mystery serial’s dead and off the net, and maybe it’ll stay that way.

When I first started writing fiction again in the middle of 2007, after a hiatus of over a decade, I realized that I had lost the cadence and flow of writing a story. Story writing is inherently an entirely different process from that of non-fiction. As a result, I had a tendency to stall, and stall badly.The damage was spectacularly bad on a couple of short mystery stories I wrote. I was filled with sadness and despair, but I kept going ’cause I’m like that.

One day, I stumbled across the thread of a wise writer, by the name of James D. McDonald, over at AbsoluteWrite called Learn Writing with Uncle Jim. One of his suggestions is to retype the first chapter of a novel:

Now, retype the first chapter. Do this with your writer’s eye, not your reader’s eye. Think about the lengths of the sentences, the lengths of the paragraphs, the sounds of the words. Think about the order of the scenes. Notice the dialog. How are the dialog tags rendered? Where is the point of view?

The point of this exercise is this: Have you ever gone to an art museum and seen the art students sitting there with their easels and oils, copying the great masters? The point isn’t to turn them into plagairists, or to make them expert forgers. The point is to get the feeling into their hands and arms of how to make the brush strokes that create a particular illusion on canvas. Writing is no less a physical skill than painting.

I thought that was pretty crazy, and didn’t try it at first.

One day I decided, what the heck.

Well, I don’t think it’s crazy anymore.

So let me take you on my journey of retyping “The Adventure of the Speckled Band”.

Continue reading

Dance of the Blame Fairy

“I think the reason you’ve never seen me manic is because when I am, I cancel all our appointments.”

Let’s just say this week was greatest bipolar hits from 2011.

Or let’s not; let’s unpack that, because it’s hard enough to go on with this in my skull.

This week, I found out that Spontaneous ∂erivation had been “pharma-hacked”. Most of you wouldn’t have seen it, but Google and other search indices did, where my content was replaced with anything from full shopfronts to content from 12/23/2011, which I figure was the actual hack date, seeded through with pharmaceutical spam. So, not connected to DreamHost’s recent security woes, that I know of.

I discovered this on joining Google+, which, by connecting me with my own content, exposed what was going on. This is not a plug for Google+, but just an interesting side note.

Now for the bag of stir-crazy: I’ve been stuck at home for two weeks, due to peer reviews and then snow. During this time my mania was also starting to get out of control, and since I was also oncall last week, I didn’t sleep more than a handful of hours from Friday through to Monday. Then I was oncall again Monday night, so by Tuesday I was running on maybe… six hours of sleep over four days?

Then I discovered the hack, and lost it. I jumped to all sorts of bizarre conclusions, leaped great canyons of illogic without realizing anything was wrong, screwed up my relationship (such as it is) with DreamHost, and wigged out on my closest friends. If you know someone who’s bipolar, you know how… disconnected I was with reality.

I didn’t sleep on Tuesday night. The hacks kept happening, which meant a backdoor in a plugin, but I just couldn’t accept it goddamnit.

By Wednesday the mania had receeded enough for me to see sense, and raze my wordpress installs all to the ground. This had to be done several times, because at least one plugin, freshly installed from WordPress.org, came backdoored. (You know, the minimalism is kind of entertaining. I pretty much don’t want to install plugins ever again, or mess with a theme that isn’t from WordPress. The Tim Thumb AJAX scripts can go die in a fire.)

I slept 6 hours after the mania crashed into depression on Wednesday.

For some reason on Thursday, my boss, who is very into preventative measures (i.e., if he waits too long and I flame out, it’s too late), took me aside and told me gently to go home. For the rest of the week. No, this isn’t a pink slip; this is because he’s seen me like this before: during the events that led to taking intermittent FMLA leave in the first place.

I can never live that down. And I don’t really want to.

Anyways: I wasn’t being very introspective or very monitoring of myself while all this was happening, and even a bit before. At the same time, bipolar is bipolar, and a hack is a hack. And it’s not the end of the world.

Except that I can never forgive myself. I know there was a post about forgiving oneself that circulated around; trust me, I’m not ready to read it and may never be. This is very much about how my parents treated me. Y’see, my parents had this interesting approach to raising a kid: when something goes wrong, beat the kid and tell them it was their fault. My father handled the first part, my mother the second part after he got his rage all tired out.

I framed this as “teaching right from wrong” but… it’s not teaching the kid right from wrong, is it. My friend pointed this out: “That’s teaching how to be utterly afraid of doing anything wrong and take all the blame on yourself for things that you cannot control, then feel awful when it doesn’t work.”

My bartender had a similar take. We talked about it further. He had another insight, which is that my parents also punished without distinguishing right from wrong. I was never told when I was doing something good, it was purely all negative reinforcement. Except once my mother told me that my father was actually very proud of me—it’s just that if he showed it to me, I would no longer try my best, so this was for my own good. So I basically had to take it on faith that my father loved me. And damn, how I would do anything, including accepting blame for him knocking over a lamp or for wanting to go to band’s celebratory dinner, for that love.

I made great leaps of logic to try to figure out what would please my father without being told in the first place.

Man, being a kid sucks, when you want love that bad from someone who will never give it to you except when trying to emotionally manipulate you.

Oh, here’s an interesting little story. Once upon a time, my mother bought a floor lamp that was thin and skinny, a modern thing. My father hated it upon sight, and began to hit her because he was convinced that you couldn’t return electric devices to the store. I’m serious. So I took the lamp, and the receipt, and the car keys, and returned the lamp to the store. I should have gone to the police, but that ploy only resulted in strangling the last time. I gave my father the money.

Result? Beating, along with cries of “why didn’t you stop your mother from buying that lamp!”

Afterwards, my mother took care of me and explained all the while that this I deserved wholly and utterly.

You see my point.

I’m fortunate in that I managed to learn from outside my family what was right and wrong, at least with the more important topics, but I have never applied right/wrong as separate concepts to myself; it’s all just blame. Which is, admittedly, better for society than the obverse would be.

Anyways, now I’m aware of my tendency to pin enormous amounts of blame only on myself, but it’s kind of awful that I can’t actually seem to rescind the belief that I don’t deserve forgiveness. It’s buried way deep, beyond logic. And this is the reason I like my bartender: he didn’t keep telling me to “just forget it”, because he knew how deep the wound went. The wound may always be there, but I don’t have to let it determine how I act. I think the next session he will add the concept of “or how I feel”, he tends to build things up gradually.

And yes, he has made very sure that I have appointments coming up. I will try to not cancel them, which should be easy because now I’m in the depressive cycle. I can tell because I have no desire to eat.

Friday will be sleeps day, assuming there are no more hacks.

An Announcement About Hackery, Sherlock Holmes, and Tea

As some of you may know, S∂ was hacked. What was discovered later was that the backdoor had been installed in my Sherlock Holmes site, and was likely the code that was spreading and infecting the main site.

I’ve burned all my sites to the ground and rebuilt only the main site. Every password and key has been changed, and now there are few enough plugins that scanning for a hack will not be a difficult task.

If you want to know which files were hacked, here’s the WordPress.com forum post.

When I started writing again, I could really only watch one site at a time. Holmes and Tea fell by the wayside, harmlessly I thought, but as was shown, oh, not harmlessly at all.

Because both Holmes and Tea are full of worms and I don’t have time to debug them both, they will no longer exist as their own sites. However, their more worthy bits of content will be fully absorbed into this site over time.

Also this means that S∂ will have content while I’m struggling with Seal Tales, so hooray!

S∂ Continues to Be Hacked

Information on my Google+ post here. Full symptoms and how to diagnose.

The culprit? In your wordpress installation, look for a file called default-constants.php in the wp-includes/ directory. In the middle of the file (or who knows where they might put it next time), you’ll find the following block of code as seen here.

I don’t know what it does. But there’s some kind of site mirroring going on in some hacky lair somewhere.

Update: someone or something keeps replacing the file with the hacked version.

Update: after going through all my sites with a flamethrower, I’ve been gradually restoring a few files here and there, and waiting for the hack to come back. Some day constant vigilance might not be needed.

Bipolar/PTSD/Tea/Whatevers Live Blog

05:27pm: Mighty Leaf’s Beatles’ Blend is, unlike the Beatles themselves, a fairly unforgiving tea. It’s a black/green blend, you see, two teas that naturally brew at far different temperatures from one another. The character is that of an Earl Grey merged with a Jasmine if you brew it right, which is boiling for exactly three minutes. Get any of that wrong, and you get either a dull result or an overwhelmingly bitter cup. I brew this tea right only 50% of the time, but when I do get it right, it’s one of the few offshoots of the Jasmine family that I will drink.

*sip* Ah yes, that was definitely the “dull fail” version of the brew. I swear it’s a great blend, just incredibly fussy. Practice would make perfect I think, but like I said, Jasmines are rarely my thing.

Fortunately this means I can move on with some other blend.

Speaking of which, I’ve been thinking about my story. I have to say that when I’m nerved out by a project, there is something legitimately wrong with it. And I know now what it is: questions. Questions that need to be answered, not necessarily in-story, but will inform how the story is shaped and written. No pussyfooting around with “good enough for government work” pseudo-answers. Questions from the world, to the motivations, to the rules of the world and the gods, must be answered and those answers must work.

It’s a lot of concerns to bring up for a little fantasy-in-the-future romance, but that’s just me. I try to overachieve, but it’s anybody’s guess as to whether I’ll succeed.

Now would be a good time to mention that I like to watch the scathing criticism videos of SF Debris because there’s no more amusing way to learn the wrong way of doing things than to watch televised work get ripped apart on blip.tv. As well as praised, too, when the right episodes come along.


02:57pm: Needed a bit of a rest. I know that drinking too much tea too quickly (much less tea with tannins) can mess with me a bit. Yes, I can and do drink enough to do that to myself.

But Kusmi’s Prince Vladimir is worth it. Another black tea blend that’s reminiscent of a softer Earl Grey, it involves instead softer citrus and vanilla, combined with spices for the rich Kusmi touch. To not destroy the more complicated blend of flavors, this black tea brews at 185ºF instead of 212ºF. I timed it—for an ambient temperature of 65ºF, approximately, boiled water takes a little under 1 min 30 seconds to cool in the tea pot to the appropriate temperature.

Also, I finally discovered Ce Lo Green’s “Fuck You”. I’m usually the last up against the wall in the musical revolutions. Or is that revelations? I haven’t listened to the radio in a very long time.

While chatting over SF stories, a friend of mine pointed me to this deconstruction of the innocent killer in Ender’s Game. Now, I did like Ender’s Game—it’s hard for me to not like it—but it does indeed have some problems, as everything generally does. After reading it, I wonder whether this essay incidentally revealed a softer side of Orson Scott Card; that this esteemed author cared enough about the fictional person he’d created that he ended up subconsciously sending not-so-subtle reassurances to Ender through other characters and story circumstances. That’s not the point of the essay, but it’s just what knocked through my head as another writer observing the beautiful author manipulation of the reader that is laid out for examination on the table.

I wonder, too, how much manipulation is too much? After some deliberation, I’ve decided this also lies in the realm of “earn your happy ending,” though it’s not the same. Earn your moral justification, in other words.


12:32pm: The next tea up on the palette is Harney & Sons’ Chocolate Tea, another tea blender that makes smooth 5-minute black brews. Their Chocolate Mint is actually more acclaimed, I believe, because the mint makes it perfect in tandem with the taste of fine China black. I’m also grateful to H&S for making chocolate teas that are dairy-free.

Gosh, it smells incredibly good. Tastes incredibly good, too. If you love black tea, this is like the yin to the yang of Mighty Leaf’s Vanilla Bean.

Also, is it me, or is the Tumblr dashboard just not very good at being able to tell when there are actually updates to your friends’ Tumblrs. I might want to invest in this Missing E business.


12:01pm: I love Earl Greys because they are nothing like my childhood. I can barely stand Jasmines because they are like my childhood, when my father had be prepare cheap Jasmine tea and it was never good enough and if it wasn’t it was your fault. Suspect he was bipolar too, and also suffered from PTSD. Disorders of the father, visited upon the daughter.

You know, my gender identity is strange. I’m fine with being labeled female. But when I think of myself, it’s in male terms. I’ve been told I’m totally girly because I love shopping, and that I’m fairly guy-ey because I code. I don’t know about you but those ideas seem messed up.

Screwed up by the patriarchy? Almost certainly, but not in the way you’d think. I’m starting to think I’m just fine with a male self-image and female label, but it’s the gender roles that society assigns that are messed up.

You know what? My main characters are going to like tea. There will be exotic teas in the future. I can have fun if I want.

Here’s a thing I’ve noticed about black tea: the better quality a black tea is, the smoother it is even after a long brew (i.e., 5 minutes). And Lord Bergamot is very, very smooth. Tea doesn’t have to be a throat scratcher of bitterness. Unless you’re into that sort of thing. The lower quality a black tea is, the less time you want to brew it. Bigelow’s Earl Grey, for instance, is a 2-minuter at best.


11:36am: Today is a day where I lost my mind and it’s rattling around someplace. Dealing with the logistics of bipolar is tiring at best and insane-making at worst. Dealing with the temerity of bipolar that’s waiting for an excuse to trigger the PTSD is, like, Sun Tzu type stuff.

So I get to choose between lying in bed and soaking up the sun that shines in that way. There’s the Overherd for comfort but it’s also a callback to days I would spend in bed because that was the place where I felt most secure from my father’s attacks.

Yes, well. I’m downstairs now, braving the whatevers that may come. It’s the best place to have tea, anyways, at the moment given the general state of the bedroom.

Late on pills. Terrible way to start the day. Not washed down with Lord Bergamot due to the incompatibility between bergamot and the buspar, although the Abilify should be just fine.

You know what’s not a terrible way to start the day? Tater tots. They go well with an Earl Grey, actually, especially if the Bergamot is Strong with the tea, and Lord Bergamot certainly qualifies. This is committing a very grave err in terms of class and whatnot, but you know what, I don’t care today.

I Know Nothing: How I Ended Up with an FTM Disabled Inuk as Lead

There’s this advice that’s given to beginning writers.

It is this: write only male, straight, whole, white characters because they are “easier”, they’re not “complex”, because the beginning writer just can’t handle it and why not reduce the load on their infantile-like brains?

This is some of the worst advice to ever give, ever. Humanity is complex and nobody is that simple. The above aphorism, I’m convinced, leads to such a lot of the sexism, racism, ableism, queer-phobia, and general xenophobia that infects a lot of beginning writing. Why do this to writers in the first goddamned place?

I almost committed that error in NaNoWriMo 2011. I’m not going to blame anybody but me, because I was non-self-aware enough to not think about it, and let it soak in.

So I’ll tell you a story.

Once upon a time, The Pantheon Plot was going to be about three gods attending, basically, God University. Three, for lack of a better term, white gods. If you know anything about gods, you’ll know this makes no goddamned sense because gods, like people or perhaps even moreso than people, develop out of actual cultures.

And there are a diverse number of cultures that produce gods, and they are not all of them white by far. So my choice of character backgrounds made even less sense.

It took me a few days to realize this. Gods, what an ass I was. I’d already chosen names based on moons, since a lot of them are indeed named after gods. I changed one name, Lysithea, to Lisao, as a Chinese goddess—or at least, a spirit who has been chosen to aspire to deityhood. I changed another name a few times, eventually landing on Vidor, another aspiring-to-be-goddess who actually did have a real Old Norse culture behind her, rather than just assuming, hey, unnamed mainstream culture good enough (what bullshit).

Why goddesses? Because I remember a criticism I had received was that I tended to write female characters into the background, giving them no importance. This is especially ironic because I am female. That straight-white-able-male advice, it’s fucking insiduous, and I was a fucking stupid-head. Poof, gender change. And by now I had read enough analysis and enough books to know that all that advice that says gender has no real meaning anyways? Yeah, fake as something that’s really fake. And also gender is a complicated concept that depends on culture. See how this all ties together?

The last was a character I named, from the start, Siarnaq, the white god in this trio. Ahahaha, now we reach the really no goddamned sense phase of things, because Siarnaq is an Inuit deity (and also the name of a retrograde satellite around Saturn—perfect for an odd, eccentric character).

I could have changed the name and had a white Greek god. But I decided to roll with it—as I later found out, Inuit mythology is so ignored that it’s practically criminal for those of us fond of mythopoeic literature. But at the time I decided it made more sense regardless for Siarnaq to become an Inuit god.

No, the rabbit hole of nonsensicalness of my character background choice goes even deeper. Siarnaq is one of the most important goddesses, if not the most important, of every Inuit culture. She goes by many names, in fact, but she’s female and happens to have had all her fingers chopped off.

Now, I could have backed things all the way out. But what kind of cowardliness is that? Bigoted cowardliness, that’s what. Anyways, I like rolling with things because they’re interesting, and not only because it’s considered unwise by all those advice-givers. Siarnaq became Sanna who would change that name to something male, because I still wanted a god, but obviously he’d started out as a goddess. Or a female seal spirit, you know how these things go. Working from that, he’s obviously an FTM transexual.

And those fingers? Well, if the Terrible Old Woman Down There who controls all the animals of the sea, and the sea itself, and can cause famine and horror and etc when displeased couldn’t get her fingers back, neither was he. Disabled character for whom no magic in the Universe was going to heal him all up nice and neat.

Now I had a trio of deities for my protagonists: two female, one male.

Someone will say that I cheated, that I only created Psann neé Sanna because I wanted to bow to inclusiveness. That Lisao and Vidor were only the result of that same desire for inclusiveness.

No. It wasn’t because I wanted to be inclusive for the hell of it. It was because of brainstorming and also making goddamned sense while I was thinking.

(I’m also waiting for someone to accuse me of cheating because why not have three goddesses, and transexuals are cheating, and gods, don’t make me punch you.)

And so it goes.

I admit, the background of my eccentric and shallow-acting character made me want to explore him more. I innocently started a backstory story that has turned into a novella, from the planning of it, and involves another female character who I’m not going to leave behind to the background. I also refuse to let that story fall into the stupid stereotype of what I call Surprise It’s a Trap! end reveal, because that shit is just insulting and unimaginative.

Psann started as the Seal Maiden, but it’s just a title and he was always a he, even if nature conspired against that, and later some rather sexist gods.

But here’s an important part to take away from all this bungling of mine. These attributes do not define these characters. I’m not saying these attributes have no effect; obviously they fucking do, and to say otherwise is asinine. To write as if they don’t matter, and yet to write them as stereotypes (good gods) is also asinine. There are real-people personality traits these characters have, such as Psann’s tendency to follow his heart rather than his head, his eccentricity (no, his transexual aspect does not count in this), his strange emotional core in the face of severe trauma.

I have seen the following question asked: if you’re not going to write, what shall we call them, hmm, how about white bread characters (what a horrible thing), how do you write about them if you’re not them?

This is where reading widely comes in. Read widely: across genre, across culture, across gender, across fiction and non-fiction. Read personal accounts on blogs, in books, in articles, and so on. And most important of all, get in variety. And for gods’ sake, do not turn to paternalistic methods ((Example I have seen on NaNoWriMo boards: “Write them with a cultural aspect they should be proud of!” which is another fine way of saying “write stereotypes!”)) to write “ethnic” characters.

That’s one of the best pieces of real writing advice I’ve received. Wise men and women have told me this. For once I’ll actually listen.

And yet… it’s also one that a lot of people don’t want to do. It’s hard, I admit, but once you do it, you become that much more secure in what you want to do, and you grow as a writer. That’s what I found out, anyways. And yes… it’s time-consuming. But do you want to turn out ill-researched crap people will punch holes in?

I hope the answer is no, but you know, we all do our own things, and obviously I’m biased.

I’ll also add that… just try to understand people, whoever they may be. I have a hard time with this, because I’m as self-reflective as a rock and I tend to be about as reflective about other people. But I believe it’s the path to being a good writer. Is it the path?

Well, I do rather know nothing.

I Know Nothing: Why I Call It That

Nick Mamatas, a wise man, has written of the tiresome advice that writers write for other writers. I am guilty of, in the distant past, writing about these. That’s why I’ve backed off nowadays, declared that I Know Nothing, and am now writing about what I actually have experienced as a writer (a really young writer) or have analyzed through other people’s works.

The “Show Don’t Tell” item is particularly amusing to me, as the authors of Self-Editing for Fiction Writers had to, in their second edition, go back over when to show and when to tell, because people took their initial advice way too strictly. People who claim “show don’t tell” as a strict principle do worse than my own outing in 2008 exploring description and show/tell in a Sherlock Holmes story. And as I know nothing (I was, after all, relying on my own analysis of a story written by someone better than me), while they know things, that’s really saying something.

I’m guessing if a writer has something to say about writing, they should illustrate the point rather than throwing it out there with little context. And through illustrating the point, they can, I kinda hope, figure out whether it applies personally or globally, or whether the point they’re trying to make is actually another point. For instance, “write every day” is actually “practice a lot even when you don’t feel like it”. The terms of practicing are up to the individual temperament and skills of a writer. “Revise, revise, revise” is actually “if your internal and/or external feedback says that you suck, then suck it up and revise, or throw it out and do something else.”

It’s just easier to wrap everything in soundbites, isn’t it, especially the more complex and nuanced something is, and writing is complex and nuanced. I’ve never thought of writing as a “spooky art” before but that particular sound bite fits.

I really… really quite like, possibly to unwise degrees, the admonition that “aiming for the top” isn’t the key to happiness as a writer. You’re better off aiming for what you want. This and other points remind me of Keffy’s post about targeting specific markets rather than aiming at what is likely to be rejection. Working out what you really want is harder. For instance, I have a strong desire for my work to outlast my life because I will leave no descendents on this earth except for the imaginary ones, and traditional publishing is not necessarily compatible with this ideal.

As for most redundant aphorism, “Don’t Give Up” gets my vote. Because the people who won’t give up pretty much won’t give up, because we are insane, and you can’t smack sense into insanity. I should know. I came back to writing even though it eats into my free time outside of a day job that makes me money.

Some young writer somewhere will say, “But then what can I give advice on?”

And I guess the only answer is to admit you know nothing and go on from there.

Neatness of the Week: What Every Woman Must Not Say

This is a poem written by Alice Duer Miller, who was awesome. I hope she’s looking at us from the directional choice of her afterlife and writing more poems.

There’s one poem that stands out to me amongst all the awesome ones here:

What Every Woman Must Not Say

“I don’t pretend I’m clever,” he remarked, “or very wise,”
And at this she murmured, “Really,” with the right polite surprise.

“But women,” he continued, “I must own I understand;
Women are a contradiction—honorable and underhand—

Constant as the star Polaris, yet as changeable as Fate,
Always flying what they long for, always seeking what they hate.”

“Don’t you think,” began the lady, but he cut her short: “I see
That you take it personally—women always do,” said he.

“You will pardon me for saying every woman is the same,
Always greedy for approval, always sensitive to blame;

Sweet and passionate are women; weak in mind, though strong in soul;
Even you admit, I fancy, that they have no self-control?”

“No, I don’t admit they haven’t,” said the patient lady then,
“Or they could not sit and listen to the nonsense talked by men.”

There are a lot of guys out there who still say this type of thing.